A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Snopok, P.

Paper Title Page
WEPE080 Six-Dimensional Cooling Lattice Studies for the Muon Collider 3533
 
  • P. Snopok, G.G. Hanson
    UCR, Riverside, California
 
 

A significant reduction in the six-dimensional emittance of the initial beam is required in any proposed Muon Collider scheme. Two lattices based on the original RFOFO ring design representing different stages of cooling are considered. One is the so-called open cavity lattice addressing the problem of the 201.25 MHz RF cavities running in a magnetic field, the other one is the 805 MHz RF lattice that is used for smaller emittances. The details of the acceptance analysis and tracking studies of both channels are presented and compared to the independent ICOOL implementation.

 
WEPE081 Wedge Absorber Design for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment 3536
 
  • P. Snopok, L. Coney
    UCR, Riverside, California
  • A. Jansson
    Fermilab, Batavia
  • C.T. Rogers
    STFC/RAL/ASTeC, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon
 
 

In the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE), muons are cooled by ionization cooling. Muons are passed through material, reducing the total momentum of the beam. This results in a decrease in transverse emittance and a slight increase in longitudinal emittance, but overall reduction of 6D beam emittance. In emittance exchange, a dispersive beam is passed through wedge-shaped absorbers. Muons with higher energy pass through more material, resulting in a reduction in longitudinal and transverse emittance. Emittance exchange is a vital technology for a Muon Collider and may be of use for a Neutrino Factory. Two ways to demonstrate emittance exchange in the straight solenoidal lattice of MICE are discussed. One is to let a muon beam pass through a wedge shaped absorber; the input beam distribution must be carefully selected to accommodate chromatic aberrations in the solenoid lattice. Another approach is to use the input beam for MICE without beam selection. In this case no polynomial weighting is involved; however, a more sophisticated shape of the absorber is required to reduce longitudinal emittance.