A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Assmann, R.W.

Paper Title Page
MOPEC003 Operational Experience during Initial Beam Commissioning of the LHC 456
 
  • K. Fuchsberger, R. Alemany-Fernandez, G. Arduini, R.W. Assmann, R. Bailey, O.S. Brüning, B. Goddard, V. Kain, M. Lamont, A. Macpherson, M. Meddahi, G. Papotti, M. Pojer, L. Ponce, S. Redaelli, M. Solfaroli Camillocci, W. Venturini Delsolaro, J. Wenninger
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

After the incident on the 19th September 2008 and more than one year without beam the commissioning of the LHC started again on November 20, 2009. Progress was rapid and collisions under stable beam conditions were established at 1.2 TeV within 3 weeks. In 2010 after qualification of the new quench protection system the way to 3.5 TeV was open and collisions were delivered at this energy after a month of additional commissioning. This paper describes the experiences and issues encountered during these first periods of commissioning with beam.

 
MOPEC007 Operational Experience during the LHC Injection Tests 468
 
  • K. Fuchsberger, R. Alemany-Fernandez, G. Arduini, R.W. Assmann, R. Bailey, O.S. Brüning, B. Goddard, V. Kain, M. Lamont, A. Macpherson, M. Meddahi, G. Papotti, M. Pojer, L. Ponce, S. Redaelli, M. Solfaroli Camillocci, W. Venturini Delsolaro, J. Wenninger
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

Following the LHC injection tests of 2008, two injection tests took place in October and November 2009 as preparation for the LHC restart on November 20, 2009. During these injection tests beam was injected through the TI2 transfer line into sector 23 of ring 1 and through TI8 into the sectors 78, 67 and 56 of ring 2. The beam time was dedicated to injection steering, optics measurements and debugging of all the systems involved. Because many potential problems were sorted out in advance, these tests contributed to the rapid progress after the restart. This paper describes the experiences and issues encountered during these tests as well as related measurement results.

 
TUOAMH01 First Cleaning with LHC Collimators 1237
 
  • D. Wollmann, O. Aberle, G. Arnau-Izquierdo, R.W. Assmann, J.-P. Bacher, V. Baglin, G. Bellodi, A. Bertarelli, A.P. Bouzoud, C. Bracco, R. Bruce, M. Brugger, S. Calatroni, F. Caspers, F. Cerutti, R. Chamizo, A. Cherif, E. Chiaveri, P. Chiggiato, A. Dallocchio, R. De Morais Amaral, B. Dehning, M. Donze, A. Ferrari, R. Folch, P. Francon, P. Gander, J.-M. Geisser, A. Grudiev, E.B. Holzer, D. Jacquet, J.B. Jeanneret, J.M. Jimenez, M. Jonker, J.M. Jowett, Y. Kadi, K. Kershaw, L. Lari, J. Lendaro, F. Loprete, R. Losito, M. Magistris, M. Malabaila, A. Marsili, A. Masi, S.J. Mathot, M. Mayer, C.C. Mitifiot, N. Mounet, E. Métral, A. Nordt, R. Perret, S. Perrollaz, C. Rathjen, S. Redaelli, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Roesler, A. Rossi, B. Salvant, M. Santana-Leitner, I. Sexton, P. Sievers, T. Tardy, M.A. Timmins, E. Tsoulou, E. Veyrunes, H. Vincke, V. Vlachoudis, V. Vuillemin, Th. Weiler, F. Zimmermann
    CERN, Geneva
  • I. Baishev, I.A. Kurochkin
    IHEP Protvino, Protvino, Moscow Region
  • D. Kaltchev
    TRIUMF, Vancouver
 
 

The LHC has two dedicated cleaning insertions: IR3 for momentum cleaning and IR7 for betatron cleaning. The collimation system has been specified and built with tight mechanical tolerances (e.g. jaw flatness ~ 40 μm) and is designed to achieve a high accuracy and reproducibility of the jaw positions. The practically achievable cleaning efficiency of the present Phase-I system depends on the precision of the jaw centering around the beam, the accuracy of the gap size and the jaw parallelism against the beam. The reproducibility and stability of the system is important to avoid the frequent repetition of beam based alignment which is currently a lengthy procedure. Within this paper we describe the method used for the beam based alignment of the LHC collimation system, its achieved accuracy and stability and its performance at 450GeV.

 

slides icon

Slides

 
TUOAMH03 Channeling and Volume Reflection Based Crystal Collimation of the Tevatron Circulating Beam Halo (T980) 1243
 
  • V.D. Shiltsev, G. Annala, R.A. Carrigan, A.I. Drozhdin, T.R. Johnson, A.M. Legan, N.V. Mokhov, R.E. Reilly, D.A. Still, R. Tesarek, J.R. Zagel
    Fermilab, Batavia
  • R.W. Assmann, V.P. Previtali, W. Scandale
    CERN, Geneva
  • Y.A. Chesnokov, I.A. Yazynin
    IHEP Protvino, Protvino, Moscow Region
  • V. Guidi
    INFN-Ferrara, Ferrara
  • Yu.M. Ivanov
    PNPI, Gatchina, Leningrad District
  • S. Peggs
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
 
 

The T980 crystal collimation experiment is underway at the Tevatron to study various crystal types and parameters and evaluate if this technique would increase TeV beam-halo collimation efficiency at high-energy hadron colliders such as the Tevatron and the LHC. The setup has been substantially enhanced during the Summer 2009 shutdown by installing a new O-shaped crystal in the horizontal goniometer, adding a vertical goniometer with two alternating crystals (O-shaped and multi-strip) and additional beam diagnostics. First measurements with the new system are quite encouraging, with channeled and volume-reflected beams observed on the secondary collimators as predicted. Investigation of crystal collimation efficiencies with crystals in volume reflection and channeling modes are described in comparison with an amorphous primary collimator. Results on the system performance are presented for the end-of-store studies and for entire collider stores. Planning is underway for dedicated studies during a Tevatron post-collider physics running period.

 

slides icon

Slides

 
TUOCMH03 Initial Experience with the Machine Protection System for LHC 1277
 
  • R. Schmidt, R.W. Assmann, B. Dehning, M. FERRO-LUZZI, B. Goddard, M. Lamont, A.P. Siemko, J.A. Uythoven, J. Wenninger, M. Zerlauth
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

Nominal beam parameters at 7TeV/c will only be reached after some years of operation, with each proton beam having a stored energy of 360MJ. However, a small fraction of this energy is sufficient to damage accelerator equipment or experiments in case of uncontrolled beam loss. The correct functioning of the machine protection systems is vital during the different operational phases already for initial operation. When operating the complex magnet system, with and without beam, safe operation relies on the protection and interlock systems for the superconducting circuits. For safe injection and transfer of beam from SPS to LHC, transfer line parameters are monitored, beam absorbers must be in the correct position and the LHC must be ready to accept beam. At the end of a fill and in case of failures beams must be properly extracted onto the dump blocks, for some failures within less than few hundred microseconds. Safe operation requires many systems: beam dumping system, beam interlocks, beam instrumentation, equipment monitoring, collimators and absorbers, etc. We describe the commissioning of the LHC machine protection system and the experience during the initial operation.

 

slides icon

Slides

 
TUPEB067 Beam Commissioning of the Injection Protection Systems of the LHC 1674
 
  • W. Bartmann, R.W. Assmann, C. Bracco, B. Dehning, B. Goddard, E.B. Holzer, V. Kain, M. Meddahi, A. Nordt, S. Redaelli, A. Rossi, M. Sapinski, D. Wollmann
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

The movable LHC injection protection devices in the SPS to LHC transfer lines and downstream of the injection kicker in the LHC were commissioned with low-intensity beam. The different beam-based alignment measurements used to determine the beam centre and size are described, together with the results of measurements of the transverse beam distribution at large amplitude. The system was set up with beam to its nominal settings and the protection level against various failures was determined by measuring the transmission and transverse distribution into the LHC as a function of oscillation amplitude. Beam losses levels for regular operation were also extrapolated. The results are compared with the expected device settings and protection level, and the implications for LHC operation discussed.

 
TUPEB076 Development of hollow electron beams for proton and ion collimation 1698
 
  • G. Stancari, A.I. Drozhdin, G.F. Kuznetsov, V.D. Shiltsev, D.A. Still, A. Valishev, L.G. Vorobiev
    Fermilab, Batavia
  • R.W. Assmann
    CERN, Geneva
  • A.A. Kabantsev
    UCSD, La Jolla, California
  • G. Stancari
    INFN-Ferrara, Ferrara
 
 

Magnetically confined hollow electron beams for controlled halo removal in high-energy colliders such as the Tevatron or the LHC may extend traditional collimation systems beyond the intensity limits imposed by tolerable material damage. They may also improve collimation performance by suppressing loss spikes due to beam jitter and by increasing capture efficiency. A hollow electron gun was designed and built. Its performance and stability were measured at the Fermilab test stand. The gun will be installed in one of the existing Tevatron electron lenses for preliminary tests of the hollow-beam collimator concept, addressing critical issues such as alignment and instabilities of the overlapping proton and electron beams.

 
TUPEB080 Comparison of Carbon and Hi-Z Primary Collimators for the LHC Phase II Collimation System 1707
 
  • L. Keller, T.W. Markiewicz, J.C. Smith
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • R.W. Assmann, C. Bracco
    CERN, Geneva
  • Th. Weiler
    KIT, Karlsruhe
 
 

A current issue with the LHC collimation system is single-diffractive, off-energy protons from the primary collimators that pass completely through the secondary collimation system and are absorbed immediately downbeam in the cold magnets of the dispersion suppression section. Simulations suggest that the high impact rate could result in quenching of these magnets. We have studied replacing the 60 cm primary graphite collimators, which remove halo mainly by inelastic strong interactions, with 5.25 mm tungsten, which remove halo mainly by multiple coulomb scattering and thereby reduce the rate of single-diffractive interactions which cause losses in the dispersion suppressor.

 
THPD050 A Proposed Experiment on the Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration 4392
 
  • A. Caldwell, G.X. Xia
    MPI-P, München
  • R.W. Assmann, F. Zimmermann
    CERN, Geneva
  • K.V. Lotov
    BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk
  • A.M. Pukhov
    HHUD, Dusseldorf
 
 

Proton driven plasma wakefield acceleration holds promise to accelerate a bunch of electrons to the energy frontier in a single acceleration channel. To verify this novel idea, a demonstration experiment is now being planned. The idea is to use the high energy proton bunches from the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) at CERN, to shoot them into a plasma cell and drive large amplitude of plasma wake. The interactions between the plasma and protons are simulated and the results are presented in this paper.