|  | 
                J.P. Edelen, D.T. Abell, D.L. Bruhwiler, S.J. Coleman, N.M. Cook, A. Diaw, J.A. Einstein-Curtis, C.C. Hall, M.C. Kilpatrick, B. Nash, I.V. PogorelovRadiaSoft LLC, Boulder, Colorado, USA
K.A. BrownBNL, Upton, New York, USA
S. CalderORNL RAD, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
A.L. Edelen, B.D. O’Shea, R.J. RousselSLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
C.M. HoffmannORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
E.-C. HuangLANL, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
P. PiotNorthern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
C. TennantJLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
 |  | 
    
        |  | It is clear from numerous recent community reports, papers, and proposals that machine learning is of tremendous interest for particle accelerator applications. The quickly evolving landscape continues to grow in both the breadth and depth of applications including physics modeling, anomaly detection, controls, diagnostics, and analysis. Consequently, laboratories, universities, and companies across the globe have established dedicated machine learning (ML) and data-science efforts aiming to make use of these new state-of-the-art tools. The current funding environment in the U.S. is structured in a way that supports specific application spaces rather than larger collaboration on community software. Here, we discuss the existing collaboration bottlenecks and how a shift in the funding environment, and how we develop collaborative tools, can help fuel the next wave of ML advancements for particle accelerators. |  |