Author: Chase, B.E.
Paper Title Page
MOA3IO02
Precision Vector Control of a Superconducting RF Cavity Driven by an Injection Locked Magnetron  
 
  • B.E. Chase
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  The technique presented in this paper enables the regulation of both radio frequency amplitude and phase in narrow band devices such as a Superconducting RF (SRF) cavity driven by constant power output devices i.e. magnetrons. The ability to use low cost high efficiency magnetrons for accelerator RF power systems, with tight vector regulation, presents a substantial cost savings in both construction and operating costs compared to current RF power system technology. An operating CW system at 2.45 GHz has been experimentally developed. Vector control of an injection locked magnetron has been extensively tested and characterized with a SRF cavity as the load. Amplitude dynamic range of 30 dB, amplitude stability of 0.3% r.m.s, and phase stability of 0.26 degrees r.m.s. has been demonstrated.  
slides icon Slides MOA3IO02 [18.218 MB]  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
MOPOB17 Resonant Frequency Control for the PIP-II Injector Test RFQ: Control Framework and Initial Results 109
 
  • A.L. Edelen, S. Biedron, S.V. Milton
    CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • D.L. Bowring, B.E. Chase, J.P. Edelen, D.J. Nicklaus, J. Steimel
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Fermilab Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359.
For the PIP-II Injector Test (PI-Test) at Fermilab, a four-vane radio frequency quadrupole (RFQ) is designed to accelerate a 30-keV, 1-mA to 10-mA H' beam to 2.1 MeV under both pulsed and continuous wave (CW) RF operation. The available headroom of the RF amplifiers limit the maximum allowable detuning to 3 kHz, and the detuning is controlled entirely via thermal regulation. Fine control over the detuning, minimal manual intervention, and fast trip recovery is desired. In addition, having active control over both the walls and vanes provides a wider tuning range. For this, we intend to use model predictive control (MPC). To facilitate these objectives, we developed a dedicated control framework that handles higher-level system decisions as well as executes control calculations. It is written in Python in a modular fashion for easy adjustments, readability, and portability. Here we describe the framework and present the first control results for the PI-Test RFQ under pulsed and CW operation.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-MOPOB17  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPOA18 Low Level RF Control for the PIP-II Injector Test RFQ 323
 
  • J.P. Edelen, B.E. Chase, E. Cullerton, J. Einstein, P. Varghese
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  The PIP-II injector test radio frequency quadrupole (RFQ) arrived at Fermilab in the fall of 2015. The RFQ is a 162.5MHz H accelerator with a nominal drive power of 100kW, which produces a bunched H beam at 2.1MeV. In this paper we discuss commissioning, operational performance, and improvements to the low level RF (LLRF) control system for the RFQ. We begin by describing the general system configuration and initial simulation results. We will then highlight temperature related issues in the high power RF system, which necessitate active control over the phase balance of the two amplifiers. Finally we demonstrate performance of the RF feedback and feed-forward compensation needed to meet specification during a 20-microsecond beam pulse.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-TUPOA18  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPOA19 50-MeV Run of the IOTA/FAST Electron Accelerator 326
 
  • D.R. Edstrom, C.M. Baffes, C.I. Briegel, D.R. Broemmelsiek, K. Carlson, B.E. Chase, D.J. Crawford, E. Cullerton, J.S. Diamond, N. Eddy, B.J. Fellenz, E.R. Harms, M.J. Kucera, J.R. Leibfritz, A.H. Lumpkin, D.J. Nicklaus, E. Prebys, P.S. Prieto, J. Reid, A.L. Romanov, J. Ruan, J.K. Santucci, T. Sen, V.D. Shiltsev, Y.-M. Shin, G. Stancari, J.C.T. Thangaraj, R.M. Thurman-Keup, A. Valishev, A. Warner, S.J. Wesseln
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • A.T. Green
    Northern Illinois Univerity, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
  • A. Halavanau, D. Mihalcea, P. Piot
    Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
  • J. Hyun
    Sokendai, Ibaraki, Japan
  • P. Kobak
    BYU-I, Rexburg, USA
  • W.D. Rush
    KU, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
 
  Funding: Supported by the DOE contract No.DEAC02-07CH11359 to the Fermi Research Alliance LLC.
The low-energy section of the photoinjector-based electron linear accelerator at the Fermilab Accelerator Science & Technology (FAST) facility was recently commissioned to an energy of 50 MeV. This linear accelerator relies primarily upon pulsed SRF acceleration and an optional bunch compressor to produce a stable beam within a large operational regime in terms of bunch charge, total average charge, bunch length, and beam energy. Various instrumentation was used to characterize fundamental properties of the electron beam including the intensity, stability, emittance, and bunch length. While much of this instrumentation was commissioned in a 20 MeV running period prior, some (including a new Martin-Puplett interferometer) was in development or pending installation at that time. All instrumentation has since been recommissioned over the wide operational range of beam energies up to 50 MeV, intensities up to 4 nC/pulse, and bunch structures from ~1 ps to more than 50 ps in length.
 
poster icon Poster TUPOA19 [4.636 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-TUPOA19  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPOA52 Updates to the Low-Level RF Architecture for Fermilab 394
 
  • J. Einstein, B.E. Chase, E. Cullerton, P. Varghese
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • S. Biedron, S.V. Milton
    CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • D. Sharma
    RRCAT, Indore (M.P.), India
 
  Fermilab has teamed with Colorado State University on several projects in LLRF controls and architecture. These projects include new LLRF hardware, updated controls techniques, and new system architectures. Here we present a summary of our work to date.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-TUPOA52  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
FRA2IO02 High Precision RF Control for the LCLS-II 1292
 
  • G. Huang, K. Campbell, L.R. Doolittle, J.A. Jones, C. Serrano, V.K. Vytla
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
  • S. Babel, M. Boyes, G.W. Brown, D. Cha, B. Hong, A. Ratti, C.H. Rivetta
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • R. Bachimanchi, C. Hovater, D.J. Seidman
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • B.E. Chase, E. Cullerton, Q. Du, J. Einstein, D.W. Klepec
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by the LCLS-II Project and the U.S. Department of Energy, Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515
The LCLS-II is a CW superconducting linac under construction to drive an X-ray FEL. The energy and timing stability requirements of the FEL drive the need for very high precision RF control. This paper summarize the design considerations and early demonstration of the performance of the components and system we developed.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-FRA2IO02  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)