Paper | Title | Other Keywords | Page |
---|---|---|---|
MOCPR04 | Moving Beyond Bias | FEM, HOM, MMI, controls | 110 |
|
|||
Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725. The benefits of diverse work groups have been well documented, and our leaders speak of the need for our laboratories to become more diverse and inclusive. Despite these motivators, the field of accelerator controls remains strikingly homogeneous. This trend continues despite many long standing programs to attract underrepresented groups to STEM careers and the explicit desire of leadership to create more inclusive organizations. Research consistently points to the strong role implicit bias plays in preventing organizations from truly providing equal opportunities. The desire to become more diverse must be coupled with a strong culture, cultivated to change deeply rooted practices which influence recruiting, hiring, development, and promotion decisions based on stereotypes rather than accomplishments and abilities. Real change in this arena requires intentional action across the board, not just from human resources and underrepresented groups. This paper discusses practical approaches to changing organizational culture to enable diverse work groups to grow and thrive. |
|||
![]() |
Slides MOCPR04 [5.110 MB] | ||
DOI • | reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-ICALEPCS2019-MOCPR04 | ||
About • | paper received ※ 03 October 2019 paper accepted ※ 09 October 2019 issue date ※ 30 August 2020 | ||
Export • | reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml) | ||
WEAPP01 | Old and New Generation Control Systems at ESA | controls, operation, interface, monitoring | 859 |
|
|||
Traditionally Mission Control Systems for spacecraft operated at the European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) have been developed based on large re-use of a common implementation covering the majority of the required functions, which is referred to as mission control system infrastructure. The generation currently in operations has been successfully used for all categories of missions, including many commercial ones operated outside ESOC. It is however anticipated that its implementation is going to face obsolescence in the coming years, thus an ambitious Project is currently on-going aiming at the development and deployment of a completely new generation. This Project capitalizes as much as possible on the European initiative (referred to as EGS-CC) which is progressively developing and delivering a modern and advanced platform forming the basis for any type of monitoring and control applications for space systems. This paper is going to provide a technical overview of the two infrastructure generations, highlighting the main differences from a technical and usability standpoints. Lessons learned from previous and current developments will also be analyzed. | |||
![]() |
Slides WEAPP01 [4.794 MB] | ||
DOI • | reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-ICALEPCS2019-WEAPP01 | ||
About • | paper received ※ 26 September 2019 paper accepted ※ 09 October 2019 issue date ※ 30 August 2020 | ||
Export • | reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml) | ||