IBIC2016 - List of Authors (Dehning, B.)

Paper	Title	Page
MOPG19	Diamond Monitor Based Beam Loss Measurements in the LHC	82
	C. Xu, B. Dehning, F.S. Domingues Sousa CERN, Geneva, Switzerland E. Griesmayer CIVIDEC Instrumentation, Wien, Austria
	Two pCVD diamond based beam loss monitors (dBLM) are installed near the primary collimators of the LHC, with a dedicated, commercial readout-system used to acquire their signals. The system is simultaneously able to produce a high sampling rate waveform and provide a real-time beam loss histogram for all bunches in the machine. This paper presents the data measured by the dBLM system during LHC beam operation in 2016.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ DOI:10.18429/JACoW-IBIC2016-MOPG19
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPG71	Ionization Profile Monitor Simulations - Status and Future Plans	520
	M. Sapinski, P. Forck, T. Giacomini, R. Singh, S. Udrea, D.M. Vilsmeier GSI, Darmstadt, Germany F. Belloni, J. Marroncle CEA/IRFU, Gif-sur-Yvette, France B. Dehning, J.W. Storey CERN, Geneva, Switzerland K. Satou J-PARC, KEK & JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan C.A. Thomas ESS, Lund, Sweden R.M. Thurman-Keup Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA C.C. Wilcox, R.E. Williamson STFC/RAL/ISIS, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, United Kingdom
	Nonuniformities of the extraction fields, the velocity distribution of electrons from ionization processes and strong bunch fields are just a few of the effects affecting Ionization Profile Monitor measurements and operation. Careful analysis of these phenomena require specialized simulation programs. A handful of such codes has been written independently by various researchers over the recent years, showing an important demand for this type of study. In this paper we describe the available codes and discuss various approaches to Ionization Profile Monitor simulations. We propose benchmark conditions to compare these codes between themselves and we collect data from various devices to benchmark codes against the measurements. Finally we present a community effort with a goal to discuss the codes, exchange simulation results and to develop and maintain a new, common codebase.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ DOI:10.18429/JACoW-IBIC2016-TUPG71
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

Diamond Monitor Based Beam Loss Measurements in the LHC

82

C. Xu, B. Dehning, F.S. Domingues Sousa
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
E. Griesmayer
CIVIDEC Instrumentation, Wien, Austria

Two pCVD diamond based beam loss monitors (dBLM) are installed near the primary collimators of the LHC, with a dedicated, commercial readout-system used to acquire their signals. The system is simultaneously able to produce a high sampling rate waveform and provide a real-time beam loss histogram for all bunches in the machine. This paper presents the data measured by the dBLM system during LHC beam operation in 2016.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ DOI:10.18429/JACoW-IBIC2016-MOPG19

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPG71

Ionization Profile Monitor Simulations - Status and Future Plans

520

M. Sapinski, P. Forck, T. Giacomini, R. Singh, S. Udrea, D.M. Vilsmeier
GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
F. Belloni, J. Marroncle
CEA/IRFU, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
B. Dehning, J.W. Storey
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
K. Satou
J-PARC, KEK & JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
C.A. Thomas
ESS, Lund, Sweden
R.M. Thurman-Keup
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
C.C. Wilcox, R.E. Williamson
STFC/RAL/ISIS, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, United Kingdom

Nonuniformities of the extraction fields, the velocity distribution of electrons from ionization processes and strong bunch fields are just a few of the effects affecting Ionization Profile Monitor measurements and operation. Careful analysis of these phenomena require specialized simulation programs. A handful of such codes has been written independently by various researchers over the recent years, showing an important demand for this type of study. In this paper we describe the available codes and discuss various approaches to Ionization Profile Monitor simulations. We propose benchmark conditions to compare these codes between themselves and we collect data from various devices to benchmark codes against the measurements. Finally we present a community effort with a goal to discuss the codes, exchange simulation results and to develop and maintain a new, common codebase.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ DOI:10.18429/JACoW-IBIC2016-TUPG71

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)