eeFACT2018 - List of Authors (Furukawa, K.)

Paper	Title	Page
TUPAB01	KEKB Injection Developments	121
	K. Furukawa KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
	The e⁻/e⁺ SuperKEKB collider is now under commissioning. As e⁻/e⁺ beam injection for SuperKEKB greatly depends on the efforts during the previous KEKB project, the injection developments during KEKB are outlined as well as the improvements towards SuperKEKB. When KEKB was commissioned, approximately ten experimental runs per day were performed with e⁻/e⁺ injections in between. As another collider PEP-II had a powerful injector SLAC, the KEKB injector had to make a few improvements seriously, such as injection of two bunches in a pulse, continuous injection scheme, eventual simultaneous top-up injections, as well as many operational optimizations. The design of SuperKEKB further required the beam quality improvements especially in the lower beam emittance for the nano-beam scheme, as well as in the beam current for the higher ring stored current and the shorter lifetime.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-eeFACT2018-TUPAB01
About •	paper received ※ 20 October 2018 paper accepted ※ 19 February 2019 issue date ※ 21 April 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPAB03	Overall Injection Strategy for FCC-ee	131
	S. Ogur, F. Antoniou, T.K. Charles, B. Härer, B.J. Holzer, Y. Papaphilippou, L. Rinolfi, T. Tydecks, F. Zimmermann CERN, Geneva, Switzerland M. Aiba PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland A.M. Barnyakov, A.E. Levichev, P.V. Martyshkin, D.A. Nikiforov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia I. Chaikovska, R. Chehab LAL, Orsay, France O. Etisken Ankara University, Faculty of Sciences, Ankara, Turkey K. Furukawa, N. Iida, T. Kamitani, F. Miyahara KEK, Ibaraki, Japan E.V. Ozcan Bogazici University, Bebek / Istanbul, Turkey S.M. Polozov MEPhI, Moscow, Russia
	The Future Circular electron-positron Collider (FCC-ee) requires fast cycling injectors with very low extraction emittances to provide and maintain extreme luminosities at center of mass energy varying between 91.2-385 GeV in the collider. For this reason, the whole injector complex table is prepared by putting into consideration the minimum fill time from scratch, bootstrapping, transmission efficiency as well as store time of the beams in synchrotrons to approach equilibrium emittances. The current injector baseline contains 6 GeV S-band linac, a damping ring at 1.54 GeV, a prebooster to accelerate from 6 to 20 GeV, which is followed by 98-km top up booster accelerating up to final collision energies. Acceleration from 6 GeV to 20 GeV can be provided either by Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) of CERN or a new synchrotron or C-Band linac, distinctively, which all options are retained. In this paper, the current status of the whole FCC-ee injector complex and injection strategies are discussed.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-eeFACT2018-TUPAB03
About •	paper received ※ 20 October 2018 paper accepted ※ 19 February 2019 issue date ※ 21 April 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

KEKB Injection Developments

121

K. Furukawa
KEK, Ibaraki, Japan

The e⁻/e⁺ SuperKEKB collider is now under commissioning. As e⁻/e⁺ beam injection for SuperKEKB greatly depends on the efforts during the previous KEKB project, the injection developments during KEKB are outlined as well as the improvements towards SuperKEKB. When KEKB was commissioned, approximately ten experimental runs per day were performed with e⁻/e⁺ injections in between. As another collider PEP-II had a powerful injector SLAC, the KEKB injector had to make a few improvements seriously, such as injection of two bunches in a pulse, continuous injection scheme, eventual simultaneous top-up injections, as well as many operational optimizations. The design of SuperKEKB further required the beam quality improvements especially in the lower beam emittance for the nano-beam scheme, as well as in the beam current for the higher ring stored current and the shorter lifetime.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-eeFACT2018-TUPAB01

About •

paper received ※ 20 October 2018 paper accepted ※ 19 February 2019 issue date ※ 21 April 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPAB03

Overall Injection Strategy for FCC-ee

131

S. Ogur, F. Antoniou, T.K. Charles, B. Härer, B.J. Holzer, Y. Papaphilippou, L. Rinolfi, T. Tydecks, F. Zimmermann
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
M. Aiba
PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
A.M. Barnyakov, A.E. Levichev, P.V. Martyshkin, D.A. Nikiforov
BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
I. Chaikovska, R. Chehab
LAL, Orsay, France
O. Etisken
Ankara University, Faculty of Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
K. Furukawa, N. Iida, T. Kamitani, F. Miyahara
KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
E.V. Ozcan
Bogazici University, Bebek / Istanbul, Turkey
S.M. Polozov
MEPhI, Moscow, Russia

The Future Circular electron-positron Collider (FCC-ee) requires fast cycling injectors with very low extraction emittances to provide and maintain extreme luminosities at center of mass energy varying between 91.2-385 GeV in the collider. For this reason, the whole injector complex table is prepared by putting into consideration the minimum fill time from scratch, bootstrapping, transmission efficiency as well as store time of the beams in synchrotrons to approach equilibrium emittances. The current injector baseline contains 6 GeV S-band linac, a damping ring at 1.54 GeV, a prebooster to accelerate from 6 to 20 GeV, which is followed by 98-km top up booster accelerating up to final collision energies. Acceleration from 6 GeV to 20 GeV can be provided either by Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) of CERN or a new synchrotron or C-Band linac, distinctively, which all options are retained. In this paper, the current status of the whole FCC-ee injector complex and injection strategies are discussed.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-eeFACT2018-TUPAB03

About •

paper received ※ 20 October 2018 paper accepted ※ 19 February 2019 issue date ※ 21 April 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)