Author: Ryne, R.D.
Paper Title Page
MOPBA06 Algorithms and Self-consistent Simulations of Beam-induced Plasma in Muon Cooling Devices 186
 
  • V. Samulyak
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
  • M. Chung, A.V. Tollestrup, K. Yonehara
    Fermilab, Batavia, USA
  • R.D. Ryne
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
  • K. Yu
    SBU, Stony Brook, USA
 
  Funding: Research is partially supported by the DOE MAP program
Interaction of muon beams with plasma generated in muon cooling absorbers is an important issue affecting the efficiency of muon cooling. We have developed numerical algorithms and parallel software for self-consistent simulation of the plasma production and its interaction with particle beams and external electromagnetic fields. Simulations support the FNAL experimental program on dense hydrogen gas filled RF cavities proposed for muon beam phase space cooling and acceleration. The core code uses the particle-in-cell (PIC) method for the Maxwell equations coupled to the dynamics of particles. Electromagnetic PIC methods are combined with probabilistic treatment of atomic physics processes responsible for the plasma production. The PIC code supports the dynamics of multiple particle species undergoing rapid acceleration / deceleration (variable relativistic factor) and uses accurate charge and current conservation methods and symplectic discretization schemes. It is fully parallel and runs on multicore supercomputers. Benchmarks and simulations of experiments on gas-filled RF cavities will be discussed.
 
 
TUPBA11 TOWARDS A GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF THE MUON ACCELERATOR FRONT END 547
 
  • H. K. Sayed, J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk, R.B. Palmer, D. Stratakis
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
  • K.T. McDonald
    PU, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
  • D.V. Neuffer
    Fermilab, Batavia, USA
  • J. Qiang, R.D. Ryne
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
 
  The baseline design for the neutrino factory and muon collider front end consists of a five major components, namely the muon production target, decay channel, buncher, phase rotator, and the ionization cooling channel. Although each of the mentioned systems has a complex design which is optimized for the best performance with its own set of local objectives, the integration of all of them into one system requires a global optimization to insure the effectiveness of the local objectives and overall performance. This global optimization represents a highly constrained multi-objective optimization problem. The objectives aimed for are the number of muons captured into a stable bunches and their transverse and longitudinal emittances. These objectives are constrained by the momentum and dynamic acceptance of the subsequent acceleration systems in addition to the overall cost. A multi-objective global evolutionary algorithm is employed to address such a challenge. In this study a statement of optimization strategy is discussed along with preliminary results of the optimization.  
 
TUPBA20 A Staged Muon-based Facility to Enable Intensity and Energy Frontier Science in the US 565
 
  • J.-P. Delahaye
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • C.M. Ankenbrandt
    Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA
  • C.M. Ankenbrandt, S. Brice, A.D. Bross, D.S. Denisov, E. Eichten, R.J. Lipton, D.V. Neuffer, M.A. Palmer, P. Snopok
    Fermilab, Batavia, USA
  • S.A. Bogacz
    JLAB, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • P. Huber
    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA
  • D.M. Kaplan, P. Snopok
    Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • H.G. Kirk, R.B. Palmer
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
  • R.D. Ryne
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
 
  Muon-based facilities offer a unique potential to provide capabilities at both the Intensity Frontier with Neutrino Factories and the Energy Frontier with Muon Colliders ranging from the Higgs energy to the multi-TeV energy range. They rely on novel technology with challenging parameters, which are currently being evaluated by the U.S. Muon Accelerator Program (MAP). A realistic scenario for a complementary series of staged facilities with increasing complexity and significant physics potential at each stage has been developed. It takes advantage of and leverages the capabilities already planned for Fermilab, especially Project X Stage II and LBNE. Each stage is defined in such a way to provide an R&D platform to validate the technologies required for subsequent stages. The rationale and sequence of the staging process, as well as the critical issues to be addressed at each stage, are presented.