| Paper | Title | Page |
|---|---|---|
| TU5PFP010 | Multipactor in Dielectric Loaded Accelerating Structures | 827 |
|
||
|
Funding: Work supported by the US Department of Energy. The development of high gradient rf driven dielectric accelerating structures is in part limited by the problem of multipactor. The first high power experiments with an 11.424-GHz rf driven alumina accelerating structure exhibited single surface multipactor. Unlike the well understood multipactor problem for dielectric rf windows, where the rf electric field is tangential and the rf power flow is normal to the dielectric surface, strong normal and tangential rf electric fields are present from the TM01 accelerating mode in the DLA and the power flow is parallel to the surface at the dielectric-beam channel boundary. While a number of approaches have been developed, no one technology for MP mitigation is able to completely solve the problem. In this paper we report on numerical calculations of the evolution of the MP discharge, and give particular attention to MP dependence on the rf power ramp profile and the use of engineered surface features on the beam channel wall to interrupt the evolution of the multipactor discharge. |
||
| FR5PFP098 | Self-Consistent Non-Stationary Model for Multipactor Analysis in Dielectric-Loaded Accelerator Structures | 4532 |
|
||
|
Funding: Office of High Energy Physics, US Department of Energy (DoE). Multipactor (MP) may occur in many situations: one- and two-surface MP, resonant and poly-phase-MP, on the surface of metals and dielectrics etc. We consider this phenomenon in dielectric loaded accelerator (DLA) structures. The starting point for our work is experimental and theoretical studies of such structures jointly done by Argonne National Lab and Naval Research Lab*. In the theoretical model developed during those studies, the space charge field due to the accumulated charged particles is taken into account as a parameter. We offer a non-stationary 2D cylindrical model where the DC field is taken into account self-consistently. We have improved our previous model** and demonstrated that its predictions are in good agreement with the results of other studies***. We also demonstrate some recent results where the effects of axial particle motion are taken into account. *J.G. Power et al., PRL, 92, 164801, 2004 |