A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Hwang, W.H.

Paper Title Page
WE5PFP094 Phase Amplitude Detection (PAD) and Phase Amplitude Control (PAC) for PXFEL 2231
 
  • W.H. Hwang, M.-H. Chun, K.M. Ha, Y.J. Han, D.T. Kim, H.-G. Kim, S.H. Kim
    PAL, Pohang, Kyungbuk
  • R. Akre
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
 
 

In PAL, We are preparing the 3GeV Linac by upgrading the present 2.5GeV Linac and new 10GeV PxFEL project. The specification of the beam energy spread and rf phase is tighter than PLS Linac. In present PLS 2.5 GeV Linac, the specifications of the beam energy spread and rf phase are 0.6%(peak) and 3.5 degrees(peak) respectively. And the output power of klystron is 80 MW at the pulse width of 4 microseconds and the repetition rate of 10 Hz. In PxFEL, the specifications of the beam energy spread and rf phase are 0.1%(rms) and 0.1 degrees(rms) respectively. We developed the modulator DeQing system for 3GeV linac and PxFEL. And the phase amplitude detection system(PAD) and phase amplitude control(PAC) system is needed to improve the rf stability. This paper describes the microwave system for the PxFEL and the PAD and PAC system.

 
FR1RAI03 ATF2 Commissioning 4205
 
  • A. Seryi, J.W. Amann, P. Bellomo, B. Lam, D.J. McCormick, J. Nelson, J.M. Paterson, M.T.F. Pivi, T.O. Raubenheimer, C.M. Spencer, M.-H. Wang, G.R. White, W. Wittmer, M. Woodley, Y.T. Yan, F. Zhou
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • D. Angal-Kalinin, J.K. Jones
    STFC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire
  • R. Apsimon, B. Constance, C. Perry, J. Resta-López, C. Swinson
    JAI, Oxford
  • S. Araki, A.S. Aryshev, H. Hayano, Y. Honda, K. Kubo, T. Kume, S. Kuroda, M. Masuzawa, T. Naito, T. Okugi, R. Sugahara, T. Tauchi, N. Terunuma, J. Urakawa, K. Yokoya
    KEK, Ibaraki
  • S. Bai, J. Gao
    IHEP Beijing, Beijing
  • P. Bambade, Y. Renier, C. Rimbault
    LAL, Orsay
  • G.A. Blair, S.T. Boogert, V. Karataev, S. Molloy
    Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey
  • B. Bolzon, N. Geffroy, A. Jeremie
    IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy-le-Vieux
  • P. Burrows
    OXFORDphysics, Oxford, Oxon
  • G.B. Christian
    ATOMKI, Debrecen
  • J.-P. Delahaye, D. Schulte, R. Tomás, F. Zimmermann
    CERN, Geneva
  • E. Elsen
    DESY, Hamburg
  • E. Gianfelice-Wendt, M.C. Ross, M. Wendt
    Fermilab, Batavia
  • A. Heo, E.-S. Kim, H.-S. Kim
    Kyungpook National University, Daegu
  • J.Y. Huang, W.H. Hwang, S.H. Kim, Y.J. Park
    PAL, Pohang, Kyungbuk
  • Y. Iwashita, T. Sugimoto
    Kyoto ICR, Uji, Kyoto
  • Y. Kamiya
    ICEPP, Tokyo
  • S. Komamiya, M. Oroku, T.S. Suehara, T. Yamanaka
    University of Tokyo, Tokyo
  • A. Lyapin
    UCL, London
  • B. Parker
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
  • T. Sanuki
    Tohoku University, Graduate School of Science, Sendai
  • A. Scarfe
    UMAN, Manchester
  • T. Takahashi
    Hiroshima University, Graduate School of Science, Higashi-Hiroshima
  • A. Wolski
    Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire
 
 

ATF2 is a final-focus test beam line that attempts to focus the low-emittance beam from the ATF damping ring to a beam size of about 37 nm, and at the same time to demonstrate nm beam stability, using numerous advanced beam diagnostics and feedback tools. The construction is well advanced and beam commissioning of ATF2 has started in the second half of 2008. ATF2 is constructed and commissioned by ATF international collaborations with strong US, Asian and European participation.

 

slides icon

Slides