A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Burt, G.

Paper Title Page
TU5PFP006 Wakefield Damping for the CLIC Crab Cavity 815
 
  • P.K. Ambattu, G. Burt, R.G. Carter, A.C. Dexter
    Cockcroft Institute, Lancaster University, Lancaster
  • V.A. Dolgashev
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • R.M. Jones, V.F. Khan
    UMAN, Manchester
 
 

Funding: The work is supported by STFC


A crab cavity is required in the CLIC to allow effective head-on collision of bunches at the IP. A high operating frequency (X-band) for the crab cavity is preferred as the deflection voltage required and the RF phase tolerance are inversely proportional to the operating frequency. However, the strong inter-bunch wakefields deteriorate the quality of the colliding bunches. The short bunch spacing of the CLIC scheme and the crab cavity's high sensitivity to dipole kicks demands very high damping of the inter-bunch wakes. A crab cavity requires special attention to the damper design as its wakefield spectrum is entirely different from that of an accelerating cavity. In addition to the higher-order modes, the orthogonally polarised dipole mode (same order mode) and the fundamental monopole mode (lower order mode) also need to be damped, however their resonant frequencies make damping these modes complicated. The same order mode suppression requires the use of an azimuthally asymmetric damper. This paper investigates the nature of the wakefields in the CLIC crab cavity and the possibility of using choke-mode damping and various types of waveguide damping to suppress them effectively.

 
TU5PFP040 Novel Geometries for the LHC Crab Cavity 909
 
  • B.D.S. Hall, G. Burt
    Cockcroft Institute, Lancaster University, Lancaster
  • R. Calaga
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
  • J.R. Delayen, R.A. Rimmer, H. Wang
    JLAB, Newport News, Virginia
  • J.D.A. Smith
    Lancaster University, Lancaster
 
 

In 2017 the LHC is envisioned to increase is luminosity via an upgrade. This upgrade is likely to require a large crossing angle hence a crab cavity is required to align the bunches prior to collision. There are two possible schemes for crab cavity implementation, global and local. In a global crab cavity the crab cavity is far from the IP and the bunch rotates back and forward as it traverses around the accelerator in a closed orbit. For this scheme a two cell elliptical squashed cavity at 800 MHz is preferred. To avoid any potential beam instabilities all the modes of the cavities must be damped strongly, however crab cavities have lower order and same order modes in addition to the usual higher order modes and hence a novel damping scheme must be used to provide sufficient damping of these modes. In the local scheme two crab cavities are placed at each side of the IP two start and stop rotation of the bunches. This would require crab cavities much smaller transversely than in the global scheme but the frequency cannot be increased any higher due to the long bunch length of the LHC beam. This will require a novel compact crab cavity design.

 
WE5PFP049 Phase Control Testing of Two Superconducting Crab Cavities in a Vertical Cryostat 2110
 
  • P. Goudket, S.C. Appleton, R. Bate, C.D. Beard, B.D. Fell, J.-L. Fernandez-Hernando, P.A. McIntosh, S.M. Pattalwar
    STFC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire
  • P.K. Ambattu, G. Burt, A.C. Dexter, B.D.S. Hall, M.I. Tahir
    Cockcroft Institute, Lancaster University, Lancaster
 
 

The ILC crab cavities require very tight phase control in order to operate within the ILC parameters. In order to verify that the phase control system met the design tolerances, two single-cell niobium 3.9GHz superconducting dipole-mode cavities were tested in a liquid helium cryostat. The preparation of the cavities, design of the testing apparatus and performance of the phase control system are described in this paper.

 
MO4RAC02 Status of LHC Crab Cavity Simulations and Beam Studies 85
 
  • R. Calaga, R. De Maria
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
  • R.W. Assmann, J. Barranco, F. Caspers, E. Ciapala, T.P.R. Linnecar, E. Métral, Y. Sun, R. Tomás, J. Tuckmantel, Th. Weiler, F. Zimmermann
    CERN, Geneva
  • G. Burt
    Lancaster University, Lancaster
  • Y. Funakoshi, A. Morita, Y. Morita, K. Nakanishi, Y. Ohnishi
    KEK, Ibaraki
  • Z. Li, A. Seryi, L. Xiao
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • P.A. McIntosh
    STFC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire
  • J. Qiang
    LBNL, Berkeley, California
  • N. Solyak, V.P. Yakovlev
    Fermilab, Batavia
 
 

Funding: This work was partially performed under the auspices of the US DOE and the European Community-Research Infrastructure, FP6 programme (CARE, contract number RII3-CT-2003-506395)}


The LHC crab cavity program is advancing rapidly towards a first prototype which is anticipated to be tested during the early stages of the LHC phase I upgrade and commissioning. Some aspects related to crab optics, collimation, aperture constraints, impedances, noise effects, beam transparency and machine protection critical for a safe and robust operation of LHC beams with crab cavities are addressed here.

 

slides icon

Slides