Author: Schilcher, T.
Paper Title Page
THPC061 Comparison of Linear Optics Correction Means at the SLS 3032
 
  • M. Aiba, M. Böge, J.T.M. Chrin, N. Milas, T. Schilcher, A. Streun
    PSI, Villigen, Switzerland
 
  The ex­per­i­men­tal de­ter­mi­na­tion of lin­ear op­tics is a fun­da­men­tal pre­req­ui­site to achiev­ing a high per­for­mance stor­age ring. In order to fur­ther en­hance SLS per­for­mance and to sim­u­la­ta­neous­ly re­veal the lim­i­ta­tions of the var­i­ous tech­niques, we per­form a sys­tem­at­ic study of lin­ear op­tics op­ti­miza­tion using var­i­ous in­de­pen­dent meth­ods. These in­clude an anal­y­sis of the orbit re­ponse (LOCO), turn-by-turn data, and the re­sponse of the tune, whose cor­rec­tion is ac­com­plished using the stan­dard SLS pro­ce­dure of vary­ing the quadrupole strengths. A com­par­i­son of re­sults from these pro­ce­dures, which use fully in­de­pen­dent ob­serv­ables, pro­vides us with a valu­able cross-check. For ex­am­ple, the be­ta­tron phase ad­vances be­tween BPMs, which is in­de­pen­dent of BPM cal­i­bra­tion, con­firms the op­tics cor­rec­tion as de­ter­mined from LOCO. The lin­ear op­tics are hence bet­ter op­ti­mized, and these pro­ce­dures, LOCO in par­tic­u­lar, fur­ther serve to ex­pose any pre­vi­ous­ly hid­den mis-cal­i­bra­tion of pa­ram­e­ters e.g. from BPMs and cor­rec­tor mag­nets. Sys­tem­at­ic er­rors from turn-by-turn data could also be vast­ly re­duced by a bet­ter syn­chro­niza­tion of the BPM trig­gers with the elec­tron beam.