Author: Boccone, V.
Paper Title Page
TUPS036 High Energy Beam Impacts on Beam Intercepting Devices: Advanced Numerical Methods and Experimental Set-up 1614
 
  • A. Bertarelli, V. Boccone, F. Carra, F. Cerutti, A. Dallocchio, N. Mariani, M.A. Timmins
    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
  • L. Peroni, M. Scapin
    Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
 
  Funding: This work has been carried out through of the European Coordination for Accelerator Research and Development (EuCARD), co-sponsored by EU 7th Framework Program.
Beam In­ter­cept­ing De­vices are po­ten­tial­ly ex­posed to se­vere ac­ci­den­tal events trig­gered by di­rect im­pacts of en­er­get­ic par­ti­cle beams. State-of-the-art nu­mer­i­cal meth­ods are re­quired to sim­u­late the be­hav­ior of af­fect­ed com­po­nents. A re­view of the dif­fer­ent dy­nam­ic re­sponse regimes is pre­sent­ed, along with an in­di­ca­tion of the most suit­ed tools to treat each of them. The con­se­quences on LHC Tung­sten Col­li­ma­tors of a num­ber of beam abort sce­nar­ios were ex­ten­sive­ly stud­ied, re­sort­ing to a novel cat­e­go­ry of nu­mer­i­cal ex­plic­it meth­ods, named Hy­drocodes. Full show­er sim­u­la­tions were per­formed pro­vid­ing the en­er­gy de­po­si­tion dis­tri­bu­tion. Struc­tural dy­nam­ics and shock wave prop­a­ga­tion anal­y­ses were car­ried out with vary­ing beam pa­ram­e­ters, iden­ti­fy­ing im­por­tant thresh­olds for col­li­ma­tor op­er­a­tion, rang­ing from onset of per­ma­nent dam­age up to catas­troph­ic fail­ure. Since the main lim­i­ta­tion of these tools lies in the lim­it­ed in­for­ma­tion avail­able on con­sti­tu­tive ma­te­ri­al mod­els under ex­treme con­di­tions, a ded­i­cat­ed ex­per­i­men­tal pro­gram is pro­posed, re­ly­ing on the Hi­Rad­Mat test fa­cil­i­ty at CERN. Ex­per­i­men­tal as­pects such as sam­ple-hold­er de­sign and test set-up are de­scribed.
 
 
TUPZ012 Machine-induced Showers entering the ATLAS and CMS Detectors in the LHC 1825
 
  • R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, H. Burkhardt, F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, M. Huhtinen, W. Kozanecki, Y.I. Levinsen, A. Mereghetti, A. Rossi, Th. Weiler
    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
  • N.V. Mokhov
    Fermilab, Batavia, USA
 
  One source of ex­per­i­men­tal back­ground in the LHC is show­ers in­duced by par­ti­cles hit­ting the up­stream col­li­ma­tors or par­ti­cles that have been scat­tered on the resid­u­al gas. We es­ti­mate the flux and dis­tri­bu­tion of par­ti­cles en­ter­ing the ATLAS and CMS de­tec­tors through FLUKA sim­u­la­tions orig­i­nat­ing from ter­tiary col­li­ma­tor hits and in­elas­tic beam-gas in­ter­ac­tions. Com­par­isons to MARS re­sults are also pre­sent­ed.  
 
WEPC175 FLUKA Studies of the Asynchronous Beam Dump Effects on LHC Point 6 2397
 
  • R. Versaci, V. Boccone, B. Goddard, A. Mereghetti, R. Schmidt, V. Vlachoudis
    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
 
  The LHC is a record-break­ing ma­chine for beam en­er­gy and in­ten­si­ty. An in­tense ef­fort has there­fore been de­ployed in sim­u­lat­ing crit­i­cal op­er­a­tional sce­nar­ios of en­er­gy de­po­si­tion. FLUKA is the most wide­ly used code for this kind of sim­u­la­tions at CERN be­cause of the high re­li­a­bil­i­ty of its re­sults and the ease to cus­tom de­tailed sim­u­la­tions all along hun­dreds of me­ters of beam line. We have in­ves­ti­gat­ed the ef­fects of an asyn­chronous beam dump on the LHC Point 6 where, beams with a stored en­er­gy of 360 MJ, can in­stan­ta­neous­ly re­lease up to a few J cm-3 in the cryo­genic mag­nets which have a quench limit of the order of the mJ cm-3. In the pre­sent paper we will briefly in­tro­duce FLUKA, de­scribe the sim­u­la­tion ap­proach, and dis­cuss the eval­u­at­ed max­i­mum en­er­gy re­lease onto the su­per­con­duct­ing mag­nets dur­ing an asyn­chronous beam dump. We will then anal­yse the shield­ing pro­vid­ed by col­li­ma­tors in­stalled in the area and dis­cuss safe­ty lim­its for the op­er­a­tion of the LHC.  
 
THPS055 Controlling Beamloss at Injection into the LHC 3553
 
  • B. Goddard, F. Alessio, W. Bartmann, P. Baudrenghien, V. Boccone, C. Bracco, M. Brugger, K. Cornelis, B. Dehning, A. Di Mauro, L.N. Drosdal, E.B. Holzer, W. Höfle, R. Jacobsson, V. Kain, M. Meddahi, V. Mertens, A. Nordt, J.A. Uythoven, D. Valuch, S. Weisz, E.N. del Busto
    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
  • R. Appleby
    UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom
 
  Loss­es at in­jec­tion into the su­per­con­duct­ing LHC can ad­verse­ly af­fect the ma­chine per­for­mance in sev­er­al im­por­tant ways. The high in­ject­ed beam in­ten­si­ty and en­er­gy mean that pre­cau­tions must be taken against dam­age and quench­es, in­clud­ing col­li­ma­tors placed close to the beam in the in­jec­tion re­gions. Clean in­jec­tion is es­sen­tial, to avoid spu­ri­ous sig­nals on the sen­si­tive beam loss mon­i­tor­ing sys­tem which will trig­ger beam dumps. In ad­di­tion, the use of the two in­jec­tion in­ser­tions to house down­stream high en­er­gy physics ex­per­i­ments brings con­straints on per­mit­ted beam loss lev­els. In this paper the sources of in­jec­tion beam loss are dis­cussed to­geth­er with the con­tribut­ing fac­tors and var­i­ous is­sues ex­pe­ri­enced in the first full year of LHC op­er­a­tion. Sim­u­la­tions are com­pared with mea­sure­ment, and the im­ple­ment­ed and planned mit­i­ga­tion mea­sures and di­ag­nos­tic im­prove­ments are de­scribed. An out­look for fu­ture LHC op­er­a­tion is given.  
 
THPZ032 Evaluation of the Combined Betatron and Momentum Cleaning in Point 3 in Terms of Cleaning Efficiency and Energy Deposition for the LHC Collimation Upgrade 3762
 
  • L. Lari, R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, M. Brugger, F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, A. Rossi, R. Versaci, V. Vlachoudis, D. Wollmann
    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
  • A. Faus-Golfe, L. Lari
    IFIC, Valencia, Spain
  • A. Mereghetti
    UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom
 
  Funding: This work has been carried out through of the European Coordination for Accelerator Research and Development (EuCARD), co-sponsored by EU 7th Framework Program.
The Phase I LHC Col­li­ma­tion Sys­tem Up­grade could in­clude mov­ing part of the Be­ta­tron Clean­ing from LHC Point 7 to Point 3 to im­prove both op­er­a­tion flex­i­bil­i­ty and in­ten­si­ty reach. In ad­di­tion, the par­tial re­lo­ca­tion of beam loss­es from the cur­rent Be­ta­tron clean­ing re­gion at Point 7 will mit­i­gate the risks of Sin­gle Event Up­sets to equip­ment in­stalled in ad­ja­cent and part­ly not ad­e­quate shield­ed areas. A com­bined Be­ta­tron and Mo­men­tum Clean­ing sce­nario at Point 3 im­plies the in­stal­la­tion of new col­li­ma­tors and a new col­li­ma­tor aper­ture lay­out. This paper shows the whole LHC Col­li­ma­tor Ef­fi­cien­cy vari­a­tion with the new lay­out pro­posed at dif­fer­ent beam en­er­gies. As part of the eval­u­a­tion, en­er­gy de­po­si­tion dis­tri­bu­tion in the IR3 re­gion gives in­di­ca­tions about the ef­fect of this new im­ple­men­ta­tion not only on the col­li­ma­tors them­selves but also on the other beam line el­e­ments.