A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Iverson, R.H.

Paper Title Page
TUPE071 Identifying Longitudinal Jitter Sources in the LCLS Linac 2296
 
  • F.-J. Decker, R. Akre, A. Brachmann, J. Craft, Y.T. Ding, D. Dowell, P. Emma, J.C. Frisch, Z. Huang, R.H. Iverson, A. Krasnykh, H. Loos, H.-D. Nuhn, D.F. Ratner, T.J. Smith, J.L. Turner, J.J. Welch, W.E. White, J. Wu
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
 
 

The Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) at SLAC is an x-ray Free Electron Laser with wavelengths of 0.15 nm to 1.5 nm. The electron beam stability is important for good lasing. While the transverse jitter of the beam is about 10-20% of the rms beam sizes, the jitter in the longitudinal phase space is a multiple of the energy spread and bunch length. At the lower energy of 4.3 GeV (corresponding to the longest wavelength of 1.5 nm) the relative energy jitter can be 0.125%, while the rms energy spread is with 0.025% five times smaller. An even bigger ratio exists for the arrival time jitter of 50 fs and the bunch duration of about 5 fs (rms) in the low charge (20 pC) operating mode. Although the impact to the experiments is reduced by providing pulse-by-pulse data of the measured energy and arrival time, it would be nice to understand and mitigate the root causes of this jitter. The thyratron of the high power supply of the RF klystrons is one of the main contributors. Another suspect is the multi-pacting in the RF loads. Phase measurements down to 0.01 degree (equals 10 fs) along the RF pulse were achieved, giving hints to the impact of the different sources.

 
TUPE065 Surface Characterization of the LCLS RF Gun Cathode 2284
 
  • A. Brachmann, F.-J. Decker, Y.T. Ding, D. Dowell, P. Emma, J.C. Frisch, A. Gilevich, G.R. Hays, P. Hering, Z. Huang, R.H. Iverson, H. Loos, A. Miahnahri, D. Nordlund, H.-D. Nuhn, P.A. Pianetta, J.L. Turner, J.J. Welch, W.E. White, J. Wu, D. Xiang
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
 
 

Surface characterization of the LCLS RF gun cathode A. Brachmann On behalf of the LCLS commissioning team The first copper cathode installed in the LCLS RF gun was used during LCLS commissioning for more than a year. However, after high charge operation (~ 500 pC), the cathode showed a decline of quantum efficiency due to surface contamination caused by residual ionized gas species present in the vacuum system. We report results of SEM, XPS and XAS studies that were carried out on this cathode after it was removed from the gun. X-ray absorption and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveal surface contamination by various hydrocarbon compounds. In addition we report on the performance of the second installed cathode with emphasis on the spatial distribution of electron emission.

 
TUPE066 Femtosecond Operation of the LCLS for User Experiments 2287
 
  • J.C. Frisch, C. Bostedt, J.D. Bozek, A. Brachmann, R.N. Coffee, F.-J. Decker, Y.T. Ding, D. Dowell, P. Emma, A. Gilevich, G. Haller, G.R. Hays, P. Hering, B.L. Hill, Z. Huang, R.H. Iverson, E.P. Kanter, B. Kraessig, H. Loos, A. Miahnahri, H.-D. Nuhn, A. Perazzo, M. Petree, D.F. Ratner, T.J. Smith, S.H. Southworth, J.L. Turner, J.J. Welch, W.E. White, J. Wu, L. Young
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • R.B. Wilcox
    LBNL, Berkeley, California
 
 

In addition to its normal operation at 250pC, the LCLS has operated with 20pC bunches delivering X-ray beams to users with energies between 800eV and 2 keV and with bunch lengths below 10 fs FWHM. A bunch arrival time monitor and timing transmission system provide users with sub 100 fs synchronization between a laser and the X-rays for pump / probe experiments. We describe the performance and operational experience of the LCLS for short bunch experiments.

 
WEPD057 Linac Energy Management for LCLS 3224
 
  • P. Chu, R.H. Iverson, P. Krejcik, D. Rogind, G.R. White, M. Woodley
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
 
 

Linac Energy Management (LEM) is a control system program which calculates, and optionally implements, magnet setpoint settings (BDESs) following a change in Energy (such as a change in the number, phase, and amplitude of active klystrons). The change is made relative to those magnets' existing BDES setpoints by a factor encoding the change in energy. LEM is necessary because changes in the number, phase, and amplitude of the active klystrons (the so-called "Klystron complement") change the beam's rigidity, and therefore, to maintain constant optics, one has to change focusing gradients and bend fields. This paper describes the basic process and some of the implementation lessons learned for LEM at the LCLS.