Paper | Title | Page |
---|---|---|
MOPEB034 | Progress of Design Study of Interaction Region Quadrupoles for the SuperKEKB | 346 |
|
||
KEK is studying the design of the interaction region quadrupoles for the SuperKEKB of which the two beams of 4GeV/7GeV for LER/HER have a crossing angle of 83 mrad. For each beam, the final beam focusing system consisting of superconducting and permanent magnets is studied. The superconducting quadrupoles close to the interaction point for each beam are located in the compensation superconducting solenoid which cancels the solenoid field by the particle detector, Belle. These magnet parameters are optimized to obtain higher luminosity. In this paper, the design progress of final focusing system and magnets will be reported. |
||
TUPEB019 | Evaluation of the Detector BG for SuperKEKB | 1557 |
|
||
SuperKEKB is the upgrade plan of the current B-factory experiment with the KEKB accelerator at KEK. Its luminosity is designed to be 8x1035 /cm2/s (40 times higher than KEKB) and the integrated luminosity is expected to be 50 ab-1. In SuperKEKB, it is important to evaluate the beam induced BG and design the interaction region (IR) to assure the stable detector operation. To estimate the beam induced BG, we construct the beam-line simulation based on the GEANT4 simulation. In this paper, we report the BG evaluation and the IR design for SuperKEKB. |
||
WEOAMH02 | Recent Progress of KEKB | 2372 |
|
||
KEKB is an e-/e+ collider for the study of B physics and is also used for machine studies for future machines. The peak luminosity of KEKB, which is the world-highest value, has been still increasing. This report summarizes recent progress at KEKB. |
||
|
||
WEPEC022 | Beam Behavior due to Crab Cavities Break down | 2938 |
|
||
Crab cavities were installed in KEKB in 2007. The function of the cavity is to tilt the bunch of the beam in the longitudinal direction. But if the RF phase gets out of control, the cavity kicks the beam like a steering magnet. To avoid this unwanted kick, the RF phase must be controlled well. In beam operation, some disturbances may occur such as a discharge, a quench, etc. When such disturbances occur, it is very difficult to control the RF phase precisely. We can't trust measured RF phase at that time. In KEKB, beam is aborted quickly when a disturbance is detected. Beam behavior before detect the disturbances has been investigated. We discuss following items. (1)How fast should the beam be aborted after detecting disturbances? (2)How fast should RF be turned off after detecting disturbances? (3)What a kind of disturbance is harmful? (4)Is the beam abort necessary at all? (Is just to turn RF off OK?) |