A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z    

Muratori, B.D.

Paper Title Page
MOPKF060 Space Charge Effects for the ERL Prototype at Daresbury Laboratory 446
 
  • B.D. Muratori, C. Gerth
    CCLRC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire
  • N. Vinokurov
    BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk
  
  Daresbury Laboratory is currently building an Energy Recovery Linac Prototype (ERLP) that will operate at a beam energy of 35 MeV. In this paper we examine the Space Charge effects on the beam dynamics in the ERLP injector line. This is done in two distinct ways. The first is based on an analytic formula derived by Vinokurov through the envelope equations and a Kapchinsky-Vladimirsky (KV) distribution. This formula gives a rough estimate of the space charge effects in the case that no quadrupoles or dipoles are present in the injector line. The second estimate is given by the multi-particle tracking code ASTRA for the whole injector line both with and without quadrupoles. Both methods are compared and are found to be in good agreement. Typical examples of injector lines are given together with specific calculations for the ERLP.  
MOPKF061 Optics Layout for the ERL Prototype at Daresbury Laboratory 449
 
  • B.D. Muratori, H.L. Owen, J.A. Varley
    CCLRC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire
  
  The overall optics for the Energy Recovery Linac Prototype (ERLP) at Daresbury Laboratory is summarised. This includes the layout of the injector line, all chicanes used, as well as details of both the outward and return TBA arcs. The tunability in several sections of the machine is examined under different operational modes and starting parameters from the end of the booster to the dump.  
MOPKF062 Choice of Arc Design for the ERL Prototype at Daresbury Laboratory 452
 
  • H.L. Owen, B.D. Muratori
    CCLRC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire
  
  The choice of arc design for the Energy Recovery Linac Prototype (ERLP) to be built at Daresbury Laboratory is investigated. Both the overall merits and disadvantages of a TBA arc and Bates bend are considered, and space restrictions particular to Daresbury Laboratory given. Some magnet parameters are given together with a summary of the layout of the ERLP.