| Paper |
Title |
Page |
| MOPKF087 |
The Cebaf Energy Recovery Experiment: Update and Future Plans
|
524 |
| |
- A. Freyberger, K. Beard, S.A. Bogacz, Y.-C. Chao, S. Chattopadhyay, D. Douglas, A. Hutton, L. Merminga, C. Tennant, M. Tiefenback
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia
|
|
| |
A successful GeV scale energy recovery demonstration with a high ratio of peak-to-injection energies (50:1) was carried out on the CEBAF (Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility) recirculating superconducting linear accelerator in the spring 2003. To gain a quantitative understanding of the beam behavior through the machine, data was taken to characterize the 6D phase space during the CEBAF-ER (CEBAF with Energy Recovery) experimental run. The transverse emittance and energy spread of the accelerating and energy recovered beams were measured in several locations to ascertain the beam quality preservation during energy recovery. Measurements also included the RF system's response to the energy recovery process and transverse beam profile of the energy recovered beam. One of the salient conclusions from the experiment is that the energy recovery process does not contribute significantly to the emittance degradation. The current status of the data analysis will be presented as well as plans for a GeV scale energy recovery experimental run with current doubling.
|
|
| TUPLT164 |
CEBAF Injector Achieved World's Best Beam Quality for Three Simultaneous Beams with a Wide Range of Bunch Charges
|
1512 |
| |
- R. Kazimi, K. Beard, F.J. Benesch, A. Freyberger, J.M. Grames, T. Hiatt, A. Hutton, G.A. Krafft, L. Merminga, M. Poelker, M. Spata, M. Tiefenback, B.C. Yunn, Y. Zhang
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia
|
|
| |
The CEBAF accelerator simultaneously provides three 499 MHz interleaved continuous electron beams spanning 5 decades in beam intensity (a few nA to 200 uA) to three experimental halls. The typical three-user physics program became more challenging when a new experiment, G0, was approved for more than six times higher bunch charge than is routine. The G0 experiment requires up to 8 million electrons per bunch (at a reduced repetition rate of 31 MHz) while the lowest current hall operates at 100 electrons per bunch simultaneously. This means a bunch destined to one hall may experience significant space charge forces while the next bunch, for another hall, is well below the space charge limit. This disparity in beam intensity is to be attained while maintaining best ever values in the beam quality, including final relative energy spread (<2.5x 10-5 rms) and transverse emittance (<1 mm-mrad norm. rms). The difficulties related to space charge emerge in the 10m long, 100 keV section of the CEBAF injector during initial beam production and acceleration. A series of changes were introduced in the CEBAF injector to meet the new requirements, including changes in the injector setup, adding new magnets, replacing lasers used for the photocathode and modifying typical laser parameters, stabilizing RF systems, and changes to standard operating procedures. In this paper, we will discuss all these modifications in some detail including the excellent agreement between the experimental results and detailed simulations. We will also present some of our operational results.
|
|
| TUPLT165 |
A PARMELA Model of the CEBAF Injector valid over a Wide Range of Parameters
|
1515 |
| |
- Y. Zhang, K. Beard, F.J. Benesch, Y.-C. Chao, A. Freyberger, J.M. Grames, R. Kazimi, G.A. Krafft, R. Li, L. Merminga, M. Poelker, M. Tiefenback, B.C. Yunn
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia
|
|
| |
A pre-existing PARMELA model of the CEBAF injector has been recently verified using machine survey data and also extended to 60 MeV region. The initial distribution and temperature of an electron bunch are determined by the photocathode laser spot size and emittance measurements. The improved injector model has been used for extensive computer simulations of the simultaneous delivery of the Hall A beam required for a hypernuclear experiment, and the Hall C beam, required for a parity experiment. The Hall C beam requires a factor of 6 higher bunch charge than the Hall A beam, with significantly increased space charge effects, while the Hall A beam has an exceedingly stringent energy spread requirement of 2.5x 10-5 rms. Measurements of the beam properties of both beams at several energies (100 keV, 500 keV, 5 MeV, 60 MeV) and several values of the bunch charge were performed using the standard quad-wire scanner technique. Comparisons of simulated particle transmission rate, longitudinal beam size, transverse emittance and twiss parameters, and energy spread against experimental data yield reasonably good agreement. The model is being used for searching for optimal setting of the CEBAF injector.
|
|
| THPLT165 |
Synchrotron Light Interferometry at JEFFERSON Lab
|
2843 |
| |
- A. Freyberger, P. Chevtsov, T. Day, R. Hicks
Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia
- J-C. Denard
SOLEIL, Gif-sur-Yvette
|
|
| |
The hyper-nuclear physics program at JLAB requires an upper limit on the RMS momentum spread of dp/p<3e-5. The momentum spread is determined by measuring the beam width at a dispersive location (D~4m) in the transport line to the experimental halls. Ignoring the epsilon-beta contribution to the intrinsic beam size, this momentum spread corresponds to an upper bound on the beam width of σ_beam<120um. Typical techniques to measure and monitor the beam size are either invasive or do not have the resolution to measure such small beam sizes. Using interferometry of the synchrotron light produced in the dispersive bend, the resolution of the optical system can be made very small. The non-invasive nature of this measurement allows continuous monitoring of the momentum spread. Two synchrotron light interferometers have been built and installed at JLAB, one each in the Hall-A and Hall-C transport lines. The devices operate over a beam current range from 1uA to 100uA and have a spatial resolution of 10um. The structure of the interferometers, the experience gained during its installation, beam measurements and momentum spread stability are presented. The dependence of the measured momentum spread on beam current will be presented.
|
|