A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z    

Brüning, O.S.

Paper Title Page
MOPLT005 An Improved Collimation System for the LHC 536
 
  • R.W. Assmann, O. Aberle, A. Bertarelli, H.-H. Braun, M. Brugger, L. Bruno, O.S. Brüning, S. Calatroni, E. Chiaveri, B. Dehning, A. Ferrari, B. Goddard, E.B. Holzer, J.-B. Jeanneret, J.M. Jimenez, V. Kain, M. Lamont, M. Mayer, E. Métral, R. Perret, S. Redaelli, T. Risselada, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Roesler, F. Ruggiero, R. Schmidt, D. Schulte, P. Sievers, V. Vlachoudis, L. Vos, G. Vossenberg, J. Wenninger
    CERN, Geneva
  • I.L. Ajguirei, I. Baishev, I.L. Kurochkin
    IHEP Protvino, Protvino, Moscow Region
  • D. Kaltchev
    TRIUMF, Vancouver
  • H. Tsutsui
    SHI, Tokyo
 
  The LHC design parameters extend the maximum stored beam energy 2-3 orders of magnitude beyond present experience. The handling of the high-intensity LHC beams in a super-conducting environment requires a high-robustness collimation system with unprecedented cleaning efficiency. For gap closures down to 2mm no beam instabilities may be induced from the collimator impedance. A difficult trade-off between collimator robustness, cleaning efficiency and collimator impedance is encountered. The conflicting LHC requirements are resolved with a phased approach, relying on low Z collimators for maximum robustness and hybrid metallic collimators for maximum performance. Efficiency is further enhanced with an additional cleaning close to the insertion triplets. The machine layouts have been adapted to the new requirements. The LHC collimation hardware is presently under design and has entered into the prototyping and early testing phase. Plans for collimator tests with beam are presented.  
MOPLT006 The New Layout of the LHC Cleaning Insertions 539
 
  • R.W. Assmann, O. Aberle, O.S. Brüning, S. Chemli, D. Gasser, J.-B. Jeanneret, J.M. Jimenez, V. Kain, E. Métral, G. Peon, S. Ramberger, C. Rathjen, T. Risselada, F. Ruggiero, L. Vos
    CERN, Geneva
  • D. Kaltchev
    TRIUMF, Vancouver
 
  The improved LHC collimation system required significant changes in the layout and design of the warm insertion IR7. Requirements for collimation, optics, impedance, vacuum, and additional infrastructure are described and the adopted layout is discussed. Various design principles have been explored during the re-design, ranging from a regular 90 degree lattice and special low impedance lattices to an option with additional warm quadrupole units that could have extended the usable space for collimator installations in the insertion. The various constraints for the optics and cleaning design in the LHC cleaning insertions are summarized. Magnet positions and collimators were moved significantly, such that a good cleaning efficiency was maintained while impedance was reduced by a factor of two. Metallic phase 2 collimators allow a better efficiency than originally achievable and additional scrapers were allocated. The required infrastructure was specified, including a powerful cooling system for the collimators.  
MOPLT022 The Expected Performance of the LHC Injection Protection System 584
 
  • V. Kain, O.S. Brüning, L. Ducimetière, B. Goddard, M. Lamont, V. Mertens
    CERN, Geneva
 
  The passive protection devices TDI, TCDD and TCLI are required to prevent damage to the LHC in case of serious injection failures, in particular of the MKI injection kicker. A detailed particle tracking, taking realistic mechanical, positioning, injection, closed orbit and local optical errors into account, has been used to determine the required settings of the absorber elements to guarantee protection against different MKI failure modes. The expected protection level of the combination of TDI with TCLI, with the new TCLI layout, is presented. Conclusions are drawn concerning the expected damage risk level.  
MOPLT030 Performance Limits and IR Design of a Possible LHC Luminosity Upgrade Based on Nb-Ti SC Magnet Technology 608
 
  • F. Ruggiero, O.S. Brüning, R. Ostojic, L. Rossi, W. Scandale, T.M. Taylor
    CERN, Geneva
  • A. Devred
    CEA/DSM/DAPNIA, Gif-sur-Yvette
 
  We investigate the maximum LHC performance for a possible IR design based on classical Nb-Ti insertion magnets. We then extend our analysis to a ternary Nb-based ductile alloy such as Nb-Ti-Ta, a less developed but relatively cheap super-conducting material which would allow us to gain about 1 T of peak field on the coils, and discuss the corresponding luminosity reach for a possible LHC upgrade compared to that based on Nb3Sn magnet technology.  
WEPLT017 Numerical Studies of the Impact of the Separation Dipoles and Insertion Quadrupoles Field Quality on the Dynamic Aperture of the CERN LHC 1855
 
  • M. Giovannozzi, O.S. Brüning, S.D. Fartoukh, T. Risselada, F. Schmidt
    CERN, Geneva
 
  A wide range of magnets, both warm and superconducting, will be used in the LHC. In addition to main dipoles, quadrupoles are used to focus the beam in regular arcs. Special dipoles separate or merge the two beams in insertion regions. A few very strong superconducting quadrupoles squeeze the beam to achieve the required luminosity, while warm quadrupoles are used in the collimation insertions. At injection the main dipoles largely dominate beam dynamics, but contributions from smaller classes of magnets should not be neglected. Peculiar optical configurations may dramatically enhance beam dynamics effects of few magnetic elements. This paper will focus on the effect of insertion quadrupoles, e.g. wide-aperture, and warm quadrupoles, as well as separation dipoles presenting on the dynamic aperture of the LHC machine.  
WEPLT026 Dynamic Aperture Reduction from the Dodecapole Component in the LHC Main Quadrupoles and its Mechanism. 1882
 
  • A.M. Lombardi, O.S. Brüning, S.D. Fartoukh, T. Risselada, F. Schmidt, A. Verdier
    CERN, Geneva
 
  The systematic dodecapole component in the Main Quadrupoles of the LHC lattice has a strong influence on the machine dynamic aperture at injection. In this paper we quantify this effect with the help of tracking studies, explain the mechanism for the loss in dynamic aperture and look into potential correction schemes. Finally, we provide an estimate for the maximum allowed systematic dodecapole component in the MQ.