A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Secondo, R.

Paper Title Page
TUPD072 E-cloud Driven Single-bunch Instabilities in PS2 2087
 
  • M. Venturini, M.A. Furman, G. Penn, R. Secondo, J.-L. Vay
    LBNL, Berkeley, California
  • R. De Maria, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

One of the options under consideration for a future upgrade of the LHC injector complex includes the replacement of PS with PS2 (a longer circumference and higher energy ring). Efforts are currently underway to design the new machine and characterize the beam dynamics. Electron cloud effects represent a potentially serious limitation to the achievement of the upgrade goals. We report on ongoing numerical studies aiming at estimating the e-cloud density threshold for the occurrence of single bunch instabilities or significant degradation of the beam emittance. We present selected results obtained in the more familiar quasi-static approximation and/or in the Lorentz-boosted frame.

 
WEOBRA02 Simulation of E-Cloud Driven Instability and its Attenuation using a Feedback System in the CERN SPS 2438
 
  • J.-L. Vay, J.M. Byrd, M.A. Furman, G. Penn, R. Secondo, M. Venturini
    LBNL, Berkeley, California
  • J.D. Fox, C.H. Rivetta
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
 
 

Electron clouds impose limitations on current accelerators that may be more severe for future machines, unless adequate measures of mitigation are taken. Recently, it has been proposed to use feedback systems operating at high frequency (in the GHz range) to damp single-bunch transverse coherent oscillations that may otherwise be amplified during the interaction of the beam with ambient electron clouds. We have used the simulation package WARP-POSINST to study the growth rate and frequency patterns in space-time of the electron cloud driven transverse instability in the CERN SPS accelerator with, or without, an idealized feedback model for damping the instability. We will present our latest simulation results, contrast them with actual measurements and discuss the implications for the design of the actual feedback system.

 

slides icon

Slides