A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Plum, M.A.

Paper Title Page
MOPEC085 Status of the SNS Power Ramp Up 660
 
  • M.A. Plum
    ORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
 
 

The Spallation Neutron Source accelerator complex consists of a 2.5 MeV H- front-end injector system, a 186 MeV normal-conducting linear accelerator, a 1 GeV superconducting linear accelerator, an accumulator ring, and associated beam transport lines. Since initial operation began in 2006, the beam power has been steadily increasing toward the design goal of 1.4 MW. In September 2009 the power surpassed 1 MW for the first time, and operation at the 1 MW level is now routine. The status of the beam power ramp-up program and present operational limitations will be described.

 
TUPEA028 Beam Stop Design Methodology and Description of a New SNS Beam Stop 1384
 
  • Y. Polsky, P.J. Geoghegan, L.L. Jacobs, S.M. McTeer, M.A. Plum
    ORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
  • W. Lu
    ORNL RAD, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
 
 

The use of a beam stop to absorb full or partial beam at various points along a particle accelerator is commonplace. The design of accelerator components such as magnets, linacs and beam instruments tends to be a fairly focused and collective effort within the particle accelerator community with well established performance and reliability criteria. Beam stop design by contrast has been relatively isolated and unconstrained historically with much more general goals. This combination of conditions has lead to a variety of facility implementations with virtually no standardization and minimal concensus on approach to development within the particle accelerator community. At the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS), for example, there are four high power beam stops in use, three of which have significantly different design solutions. This paper describes the design of a new off-momentum beam stop for the SNS. Content will be balanced between hardware description, analyses performed and the methodology used during the development effort. Particular attention will be paid to the approach of the design process with respect to future efforts to meet beam stop performance metrics.

 
TUPD073 Effect of Bunch Shape on Electron-Proton Instability 2090
 
  • Z. Liu
    IUCF, Bloomington, Indiana
  • S.M. Cousineau, V.V. Danilov, J. Galambos, J.A. Holmes, M.A. Plum
    ORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
 
 

The instability caused by the electron cloud effect (ECE) may set an upper limit to beam intensity in proton storage rings. This instability is potentially a major obstacle to the full intensity operation, at 1.5·1014 protons per pulse, of the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS). High intensity experiments have been done with different sets of parameters that affect the electron-proton (e-p) instability, of which bunch intensity and bunch shape are considered as two main factors. In the experiment, the phase and amplitude of the second harmonic RF cavity are used to modify the bunch shape. Simulation with the beam dynamics code ORBIT has been carried out to compare with experimental results and to understand the impact of bunch shape on electron cloud build-up and beam stability. We have also attempted to benchmark the e-p model to predict the frequency spectrum and the RF buncher voltage threshold values against experimental results. Details and discussion will be reported in this conference.


* M.T.F. Pivi and M.A. Furman, PRSTAB 6, 034201 (2003)
** V. Danilov et. al, 39th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop, 2006
*** B. Macek et. al, PAC 2003

 
THPEB039 SNS Stripper Foil Failure Modes and Their Cures 3969
 
  • M.A. Plum, J. Galambos, S.-H. Kim, P. Ladd, Y. Polsky, R.W. Shaw
    ORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
  • C.F. Luck, C.C. Peters
    ORNL RAD, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
  • R.J. Macek
    LANL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
  • D. Raparia
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
 
 

The diamond stripper foils in use at the Spallation Neutron Source worked successfully with no failures until May 3, 2009, when we started experiencing a rash of foil failures after increasing the beam power to ~840 kW. The main contributions to foil failure are thought to be 1) convoy electrons, stripped from the incoming H− beam, that strike the foil bracket and may also reflect back from the electron catcher, and 2) vacuum breakdown from the charge developed on the foil by secondary electron emission. In this paper we will detail these and other failure mechanisms, and describe the improvements we have made to mitigate them.