A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Greenwald, S.

Paper Title Page
TUPD022 CesrTA Retarding Field Analyzer Modeling Results 1970
 
  • J.R. Calvey, J.A. Crittenden, G. Dugan, S. Greenwald, Z. Leong, J.A. Livezey, M.A. Palmer
    CLASSE, Ithaca, New York
  • C.M. Celata
    Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
  • M.A. Furman, M. Venturini
    LBNL, Berkeley, California
  • K.C. Harkay
    ANL, Argonne
 
 

Retarding field analyzers (RFAs) provide an effective measure of the local electron cloud density and energy distribution. Proper interpretation of RFA data can yield information about the behavior of the cloud, as well as the surface properties of the instrumented vacuum chamber. However, due to the complex interaction of the cloud with the RFA, particularly in regions of high magnetic field, understanding these measurements can be nontrivial. This paper will examine different methods for interpreting RFA data via cloud simulation programs. Possible techniques include postprocessing the output of a simulation code to predict the RFA response, and incorporating an RFA model into the program itself.

 
TUYMH02 Electron Cloud at Low Emittance in CesrTA 1251
 
  • M.A. Palmer, J.P. Alexander, M.G. Billing, J.R. Calvey, C.J. Conolly, J.A. Crittenden, J. Dobbins, G. Dugan, N. Eggert, E. Fontes, M.J. Forster, R.E. Gallagher, S.W. Gray, S. Greenwald, D.L. Hartill, W.H. Hopkins, D.L. Kreinick, B. Kreis, Z. Leong, Y. Li, X. Liu, J.A. Livezey, A. Lyndaker, J. Makita, M.P. McDonald, V. Medjidzade, R.E. Meller, T.I. O'Connell, S.B. Peck, D.P. Peterson, G. Ramirez, M.C. Rendina, P. Revesz, D.H. Rice, N.T. Rider, D. L. Rubin, D. Sagan, J.J. Savino, R.M. Schwartz, R.D. Seeley, J.W. Sexton, J.P. Shanks, J.P. Sikora, E.N. Smith, C.R. Strohman, H.A. Williams
    CLASSE, Ithaca, New York
  • F. Antoniou, S. Calatroni, M. Gasior, O.R. Jones, Y. Papaphilippou, J. Pfingstner, G. Rumolo, H. Schmickler, M. Taborelli
    CERN, Geneva
  • D. Asner
    Carleton University, College of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario
  • L. Boon, A.F. Garfinkel
    Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
  • J.M. Byrd, C.M. Celata, J.N. Corlett, S. De Santis, M.A. Furman, A. Jackson, R. Kraft, D.V. Munson, G. Penn, D.W. Plate, M. Venturini
    LBNL, Berkeley, California
  • B.T. Carlson
    Grove City College, Grove City, Pennsylvania
  • T. Demma
    INFN/LNF, Frascati (Roma)
  • R.T. Dowd
    ASCo, Clayton, Victoria
  • J.W. Flanagan, P. Jain, K. Kanazawa, K. Kubo, K. Ohmi, H. Sakai, K. Shibata, Y. Suetsugu, M. Tobiyama
    KEK, Ibaraki
  • D. Gonnella
    Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York
  • W. Guo
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
  • K.C. Harkay
    ANL, Argonne
  • R. Holtzapple
    CalPoly, San Luis Obispo, CA
  • J.K. Jones, A. Wolski
    Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire
  • D. Kharakh, J.S.T. Ng, M.T.F. Pivi, L. Wang
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • M.C. Ross, C.-Y. Tan, R.M. Zwaska
    Fermilab, Batavia
  • L. Schächter
    Technion, Haifa
  • E.L. Wilkinson
    Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois
 
 

The Cornell Electron Storage Ring (CESR) has been reconfigured as a test accelerator (CesrTA) for a program of electron cloud (EC) research at ultra low emittance. The instrumentation in the ring has been upgraded with local diagnostics for measurement of cloud density and with improved beam diagnostics for the characterization of both the low emittance performance and the beam dynamics of high intensity bunch trains interacting with the cloud. Finally a range of EC mitigation methods have been deployed and tested. Measurements of cloud density and its impact on the beam under a range of conditions will be presented and compared with simulations. The effectiveness of a range of mitigation techniques will also be discussed.

 

slides icon

Slides