A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Dubrovskiy, A.

Paper Title Page
WEPE027 Progress towards the CLIC Feasibility Demonstration in CTF3 3410
 
  • P.K. Skowronski, S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A.E. Dabrowski, S. Döbert, A. Dubrovskiy, F. Tecker
    CERN, Geneva
  • C. Biscari
    INFN/LNF, Frascati (Roma)
  • W. Farabolini
    CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette
  • R.J.M.Y. Ruber
    Uppsala University, Uppsala
 
 

The objective of the CLIC Test Facility CTF3 is to demonstrate the key feasibility issues of the CLIC two-beam technology: the efficient generation of a very high current drive beam and its stable deceleration in 12 GHz resonant structures, to produce high-power RF pulses and accelerate the main beam with an accelerating gradient of 100 MV/m. The construction and commissioning of CTF3 has taken place in stages from 2003. Many milestones had already been reached, including the first demonstration at the end of 2009 of a factor 2 x 4 re-combination of the initial drive beam pulse, thus reaching a beam current of 25 A. In this paper we summarise the commissioning highlights and the issues already validated at the earlier stages. We then show and discuss the latest results obtained, in view of the completion of the CLIC feasibility demonstration due for the end of 2010.

 
THPEA043 RF Pulse Compression Stabilization at the CTF3 CLIC Test Facility 3774
 
  • A. Dubrovskiy, F. Tecker
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

In the CTF3 accelerator, the RF produced by each of ten 3 GHz klystrons goes through waveguides, RF pulse compressors and splitters. The RF phase and power transformation of these devices depend on their temperature. The quantitative effect of the room temperature variation on the RF was measured. It is the major source of undesired changes during the CTF3 operation. An RF phase-loop and a compressor temperature stabilization are developed to suppress the phase fluctuation and the power profile change due to the temperature variation. The implementation is transparent for operators it does not limit anyhow the flexibility of RF manipulations. Expected and measured suppression characteristics will be given. As well RF measurement dependence on the temperature will be mentioned.