A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Brüning, O.S.

Paper Title Page
MOPEC003 Operational Experience during Initial Beam Commissioning of the LHC 456
 
  • K. Fuchsberger, R. Alemany-Fernandez, G. Arduini, R.W. Assmann, R. Bailey, O.S. Brüning, B. Goddard, V. Kain, M. Lamont, A. Macpherson, M. Meddahi, G. Papotti, M. Pojer, L. Ponce, S. Redaelli, M. Solfaroli Camillocci, W. Venturini Delsolaro, J. Wenninger
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

After the incident on the 19th September 2008 and more than one year without beam the commissioning of the LHC started again on November 20, 2009. Progress was rapid and collisions under stable beam conditions were established at 1.2 TeV within 3 weeks. In 2010 after qualification of the new quench protection system the way to 3.5 TeV was open and collisions were delivered at this energy after a month of additional commissioning. This paper describes the experiences and issues encountered during these first periods of commissioning with beam.

 
MOPEC007 Operational Experience during the LHC Injection Tests 468
 
  • K. Fuchsberger, R. Alemany-Fernandez, G. Arduini, R.W. Assmann, R. Bailey, O.S. Brüning, B. Goddard, V. Kain, M. Lamont, A. Macpherson, M. Meddahi, G. Papotti, M. Pojer, L. Ponce, S. Redaelli, M. Solfaroli Camillocci, W. Venturini Delsolaro, J. Wenninger
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

Following the LHC injection tests of 2008, two injection tests took place in October and November 2009 as preparation for the LHC restart on November 20, 2009. During these injection tests beam was injected through the TI2 transfer line into sector 23 of ring 1 and through TI8 into the sectors 78, 67 and 56 of ring 2. The beam time was dedicated to injection steering, optics measurements and debugging of all the systems involved. Because many potential problems were sorted out in advance, these tests contributed to the rapid progress after the restart. This paper describes the experiences and issues encountered during these tests as well as related measurement results.

 
TUXMH02 LHC Optics Model Measurements and Corrections 1232
 
  • R. Tomás, O.S. Brüning, M. Giovannozzi, M. Lamont, F. Schmidt, G. Vanbavinckhove
    CERN, Geneva
  • M. Aiba
    PSI, Villigen
  • R. Calaga, R. Miyamoto
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
 
 

Optics stability during all phases of operation is crucial for the LHC. The optical properties of the machine have been optimized based on a detailed magnetic model of the SC magnets and on their sorting. Tools and procedures have been developed for rapid checks of beta beating, dispersion, and linear coupling, as well as for prompt optics correction. Initial optics errors, correction performance and optics stability from the first LHC run will be reported, and compared with expectations. Possible implications for the collimation cleaning efficiency and LHC machine protection will be discussed.

 

slides icon

Slides

 
TUPEB034 Interaction Region Design for a Ring Ring Version of the LHeC Study 1596
 
  • B.J. Holzer, S. Bettoni, O.S. Brüning, S. Russenschuck
    CERN, Geneva
  • R. Appleby
    UMAN, Manchester
  • J.B. Dainton, L.N.S. Thompson
    Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire
  • M. Klein
    The University of Liverpool, Liverpool
  • A. Kling, B. Nagorny, U. Schneekloth
    DESY, Hamburg
  • P. Kostka
    DESY Zeuthen, Zeuthen
  • A. Polini
    INFN-Bologna, Bologna
 
 

The LHeC aims at colliding hadron-lepton beams with center of mass energies in the TeV scale. For this purpose the existing LHC storage ring is extended by a high energy electron accelerator in the energy range of 60 to 140 GeV. The electron beam will be accelerated and stored in a LEP like storage ring in the LHC tunnel. In this paper we present the layout of the interaction region which has to deliver at the same time well matched beam optics and an efficient separation of the electron and proton beams. In general the large momentum difference of the two colliding beams provides a very elegant way to solve this problem: A focusing scheme that leads to the required beam sizes of the electrons and protons is combined with an early but gentle beam separation to avoid parasitic beam encounters and still keep the synchrotron radiation level in the IR within reasonable limits. We present in this paper two versions of this concept: A high luminosity layout where the mini beta magnets are embedded into the detector design as well as an IR design that is optimised for maximum acceptance of the particle detector.

 
TUPEB037 Interaction-Region Design Options for a Linac-Ring LHeC 1605
 
  • F. Zimmermann, S. Bettoni, O.S. Brüning, B.J. Holzer, S. Russenschuck, D. Schulte, R. Tomás
    CERN, Geneva
  • H. Aksakal
    N.U, Nigde
  • R. Appleby
    UMAN, Manchester
  • S. Chattopadhyay, M. Korostelev
    Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire
  • A.K. Çiftçi, R. Çiftçi, K. Zengin
    Ankara University, Faculty of Sciences, Tandogan/Ankara
  • J.B. Dainton, M. Klein
    The University of Liverpool, Liverpool
  • E. Eroglu, I. Tapan
    UU, Bursa
  • P. Kostka
    DESY Zeuthen, Zeuthen
  • V. Litvinenko
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
  • E. Paoloni
    University of Pisa and INFN, Pisa
  • A. Polini
    INFN-Bologna, Bologna
  • U. Schneekloth
    DESY, Hamburg
  • M.K. Sullivan
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
 
 

In a linac-ring electron-proton collider based on the LHC ("LR-LHeC"), the final focusing quadrupoles for the electron beam can be installed far from the collision point, as far away as the proton final triplet (e.g. 23 m) if not further, thanks to the small electron-beam emittance. The inner free space could either be fully donated to the particle-physics detector, or accommodate "slim" dipole magnets providing head-on collisions of electron and proton bunches. We present example layouts for either scenario considering electron beam energies of 60 and 140 GeV, and we discuss the optics for both proton and electron beams, the implied minimum beam-pipe dimensions, possible design parameters of the innermost proton and electron magnets, the corresponding detector acceptance, the synchrotron radiation power and its possible shielding or deflection, constraints from long-range beam-beam interactions as well as from the LHC proton-proton collision points and from the rest of the LHC ring, the passage of the second proton beam, and the minimum beta* for the colliding protons.

 
TUPEB039 Designs for a Linac-Ring LHeC 1611
 
  • F. Zimmermann, O.S. Brüning, E. Ciapala, F. Haug, J.A. Osborne, D. Schulte, Y. Sun, R. Tomás
    CERN, Geneva
  • C. Adolphsen
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • R. Calaga, V. Litvinenko
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
  • S. Chattopadhyay
    Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire
  • J.B. Dainton, M. Klein
    The University of Liverpool, Liverpool
  • A.L. Eide
    LPNHE, Paris
 
 

We consider three different scenarios for the recirculating electron linear accelerator (RLA) of a linac-ring type electron-proton collider based on the LHC (LHeC): i) a basic version consisting of a 60 GeV pulsed, 1.5 km long linac, ii) a higher luminosity configuration with a 60 GeV 4 km long cw energy-recovery linac (ERL), and iii) a high energy option using a 140 GeV pulsed linac of 4 km active length. This paper describes the footprint, optics of linac and return arcs, emittance growth from chromaticity and synchrotron radiation, a set of parameters, and the performance reach for the three scenarios.

 
FRYMH05 Closing Remarks  
 
  • O.S. Brüning
    CERN, Geneva
 
 

Closing Remarks from the Chairman of the IPAC'11 Organizing Committee

 

slides icon

Slides