• A. Mosnier, P.-Y. Beauvais, R. Gobin, J.-F. Gournay, P. Joyer, J. Marroncle, P.A.P. Nghiem, F. Orsini
  CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette
• B. Brañas, A. Ibarra, P. Méndez, I. Podadera Aliseda, J. Sanz, F. Toral
  CIEMAT, Madrid
• M. Comunian, A. Facco, A. Palmieri, A. Pepato, A. Pisent
  INFN/LNL, Legnaro (PD)
• P. Garin, Ch. Vermare
  IFMIF/EVEDA, Rokkasho
• R. Heidinger
  Fusion for Energy, Garching
• H. Kimura, T. Kojima, T. Kubo, S. Maebara, S. O'hira, Y. Okumura, K. Shinto, H. Takahashi, K. Yonemoto
  JAEA, Aomori

The objectives of the IFMIF/EVEDA project are to produce the detailed design of the entire IFMIF facility, as well as to build and test a number of prototypes, including a high-intensity CW deuteron accelerator (125 mA @ 9 MeV). Most of the accelerator components (Injector, RFQ, Superconducting RF-Linac, Transport Line and Beam Dump, RF Systems, Local control systems, beam instrumentation) are designed and provided by European institutions (CEA/Saclay, CIEMAT, INFN/LNL, SCK-CEN), while the RFQ couplers, the supervision of the control system and the building including utilities constructed at Rokkasho BA site are provided by JAEA. The coordination between Europe and Japan is ensured by an international project team, located in Rokkasho, where the accelerator will be installed and commissioned. The design and R&D activities are presented, as well as the schedule of the prototype accelerator.

• C. Oliver, B. Brañas, A. Ibarra
  CIEMAT, Madrid
• A. Mosnier, P.A.P. Nghiem
  CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette

The design of the future IFMIF accelerators will be validated with the 9 MeV, 125 mA deuteron accelerator IFMIF-EVEDA. For this validation phase, a High Energy Beam Transport line (HEBT) is designed to drive the beam toward a beam dump with the required expansion, under the hands-on maintenance constraint. It consists of eight quadrupoles and one dipole. Given the very high space charge regime and the very high power (1.1 MW), any small deviation from the nominal conditions could seriously compromise the HEBT objective. That is why possible misalignments and rotations of those magnets as well as power supply errors have been thoroughly studied. The error budget is fairly distributed among the tolerances for the different components, and effects of those errors on loss distribution and beam profile at the beam dump entrance carefully analysed.